Loading... Please wait...

Why these European elections really matter

European ParliamentBy Claude Moraes MEP / @ClaudeMoraesMEP

These are tough political times for any politician campaigning in an election, and so it is for those from the mainstream political parties campaigning for the European elections. At the outset I want to underline the Labour MEPs' pledge on expenses, which is that Labour MEPs have for the past decade been required to have a full registered audit of their expenditure and use of public money. Their audit certificates have gone online every year since 2000. In addition, Labour MEPs going into the new Parliament will publish online detailed information about their use of public money. Notwithstanding the white noise of the expenses scandal, what are the issues at stake regarding the role of the European Parliament?

Originally, the European Parliament was an entirely appointed assembly with no powers, but today it is a powerful institution with real influence over many areas of our lives. The elections on 4 June should be seen as more than just 27 national referenda. The reality, of course, is that in most EU member states a great deal of the voting will clearly be on domestic issues - but it is important that the achievements of MEPs are not completely lost.
   
European elections clearly do not, on their own, create high turnouts. Too often European elections are seen as a test of national governments and whether voters approve or disprove of their record. In that climate, it has always been a challenge to inform the public of the importance and impact of the European Parliament on their daily lives, but this is a challenge we as MEPs and candidates in June’s election must take up.

In the current UK climate this job is even harder with at best voter apathy and at worst voter anger over recent stories over MPs' expenses. I have been all over London on the campaign trail and the anger felt by voters is clear. The public mood is hostile and some are ready to express this hostility using their votes to back the BNP or other fringe parties. In a low turnout election, this can result in a disproportionate boost to the BNP and fringe parties and magnify their true levels of support. It is therefore even more important that those of us who support our membership of the EU make our case more forcefully to counter this difficult political climate.

Labour has a good record in the European Parliament, achieving real victories for our constituents, and it is important we communicate this effectively to our voters. In this parliament, Labour MEPs fought hard to extend anti-discrimination measures for the disabled, the LGBT community and older people with clear dividing lines between us and the Conservatives and other right wing groupings who oppose such measures in the Parliament.

We have also secured employment rights for Britain’s 1.3 million agency workers with the strong backing of Gordon Brown and the government. Now unscrupulous employers will no longer be able to avoid employment protections for agency staff that full and part-time workers enjoy.

Labour MEPs have also helped secure key measures on climate change, reduced costs for consumers on flights and mobile phone calls, helped stop the flow of replica weapons onto the UK’s streets and took action in the Parliament against the evils of people trafficking.

On all of this we should be rightly proud but the work does not stop there. We need to secure as many Labour MEPs as possible to ensure that the centre-right dominance of the European Parliament comes to an end so we on the left can bring about real change to the EU bringing it closer to our constituents and making a difference to people’s everyday lives.

The Tories are intent on dragging Britain to the sidelines of Europe by leaving the centrist European People’s Party, which is a signal that they wish to take an isolationist stance, joining forces with fairly extreme European political parties like the Polish Law & Justice party and the Czech ODS. These political parties have agendas that would be a surprise to most mainstream voters and mainstream Conservatives in the EU including Merkel and Sarkozy who have registered their disquiet. The Tories want to withdraw the UK key measures such as the Social Chapter, which gave British citizens improved maternity rights, paternity rights and guaranteed paid leave. We in Labour are an internationalist party and strongly believe it is in our national interest to be at the heart of Europe, shaping key decisions that affect our lives, not sitting on the sidelines.

If the Lisbon Treaty is ratified the European Parliament is set to get more powers to legislate, amend and scrutinise and this means we have to work harder to ensure we can return many Labour MEPs to Brussels. We must get out and campaign hard to stop the BNP gaining a platform and to highlight the Tories' isolationism, but most of all so we can deliver on our commitment to social justice and fairness for all.

The political narrative for us is very clear. We understand how European parliament elections can be seen as a national referendum but to continually step back from making the progressive case for Europe will ultimately cause damage as UK citizens feel further distance from law making which will affect our lives. For this reason amongst many I will continue with my fellow candidates to help make that case.

Claude Moraes is a Labour member of the European Parliament for London and is standing in the European elections on 4 June.

Posted on May 26, 2009 at 03:07pm


17 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
"We understand how European parliament elections can be seen as a national referendum but to continually step back from making the progressive case for Europe will ultimately cause damage as UK citizens feel further distance from law making which will affect our lives. For this reason amongst many I will continue with my fellow candidates to help make that case."

I guess that means we will see you and hear from you in about five years time, at the next election then lol. Who has ever heard an elected MEP ever making the case for anything?
Ralph Baldwin @ 63 weeks and 4 days ago
No one in my eyes has ever put forward a decent argument for increased powers in Brussels. I don't fully understand political union in Europe. Ecomonic union I understand, but not political union. If the EU is doing such good work passing laws on our behalf why don't we just pass those same laws here, through our Parliament?

"If the Lisbon Treaty is ratified the European Parliament is set to get more powers to legislate, amend and scrutinise and this means we have to work harder to ensure we can return many Labour MEPs to Brussels". Again, I don't understand this logic. It seems like you're giving up on making these laws ourselves and just saying "if we going to lose these powers them we better make sure we're receiving these powers in Brussels by having more elected representatives there". Why don't we do away with this nonsense and just pass these laws through Labour politicians we've already elected?
Thomas Snoxell @ 66 weeks and 1 day ago
Nothing about the reality undemocratic and fraud-ridden EU institutions that we all know about. Just the normal multi-million £ pro-EU propaganda machine spewing out its lies.

Please remember that there are a large number of us traditional Labour supporters who what to see the reinstatement of our pre-New Labour policy of withdrawal from the EU.
Tom Sacold @ 66 weeks and 1 day ago
"If the Lisbon Treaty is ratified the European Parliament is set to get more powers to legislate..."

Whilst it's nice that you are so honest, has it occurred to you that is precisely what the majority of the UK electorate don't want to happen?

"The Tories are intent on dragging Britain to the sidelines... by leaving the EEP"

THe tories are intent on forging a new Euro-sceptic coalition from a number of other parties. I do find it amazing that person after person from the left think the Tory Party should be in a group with parties who support greater EU integration and in effect Federalism. Have you cottoned on yet that that isn't Tory policy? Seems a bit hypercritical maybe?

Yes I think the Tories would like to get rid of the social chapter and introduce laws from Westminster hat suited our economy and not some daft socailist dream from the continent

This thread is just anoter daft pro EU delusional piece by a Brussels politician. You should try spending more time in the UK, then you might get a clue about the wipe out the pro EU parties will get in a weeks time.
Guy M @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
I know I am showing my ignorance here, but I genuinely would like to understand. I've read your article and I'm wondering of the real victories won in Europe, the employment rights and the social chapter, how many of these could have been achieved here in the UK Parliament?

I'm not being a 'troll' or whatever the terminology is, I just want to understand. Why would things like employment rights for people in Britain or paternity rights for people in Britain need to be discussed, debated and decided in Brussels? What is the point? Why can't all of this be done by our elected politicians right here in our own Parliament?
Bill Dewison @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
Thanks Claude. Not that one can gave a decent discussion whilst the site is largely a mouthpiece for Tory gobshites.

Its meant to be for Labour-minded people - but essentially, it isn't working without the necessary enforcing of the guidelines. Plenty of places to read right wing headbanget lunacy - here shouldn't be one of them
Mike Homfray @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
Great way to debate, get rid of dissenting views and pretend in your cosy isolation everyone agrees with you?

Sounds like Gordon Brown's recipe for success as a PM
Guy M @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
Presumably anyone who disagrees with you and official party line is a gobshite. Pathetic - get a life!
George Woodhouse @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
I happen to be an independent gobshite.

What kind of gobshite are you?
Max Sceptic @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
Dear Claude,

Would you care to publish the line-by-line details of all expenses you have claimed as an MEP?

A simple yes or no will suffice.
Max Sceptic @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
after all 'nothing to hid, nothing to fear' and i am sure all your claims for expenses etc are 'within the rules' !
david cheeseman @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
Questions:

who is my MEP
what does an MEP do



I think that these are 2 basic questions for the electorate.
unless these are answered there is no point listening to anything else. is there?


there is no emotional like between the public and Europe. is there?
ash cash @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
... and of course you do not actually have an MEP at all. Here in the East of the UK we have seven and they are appointed by the parties. If I want to ask my MEP a question about anyhting I have to contact all seven - ridiculous - and not all of them bother to answer.
George Woodhouse @ 66 weeks and 1 day ago
I have two questions.

One, where is our referendum? Please don't insult my intelligence that a Treaty is different to a Constitution - the documents are a 99% facsimilie of each other.

Two, if the UKIP gets a larger share of the vote than Labour, will Labour take that as a rejection of their pro-EU stance?
a b @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
Finally, someone is actually talking about the euros and talking positively about it!

It's great to get perspective from what really goes on in the Euro parliament instead of from our media. What a breath of fresh air! I wish there was more info out there of the actual work our MEPs are doing. I had no idea about the stuff on guns, voters need to hear more of the good stuff going on.
Stephen Markham @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
"It's great to get perspective from what really goes on in the Euro parliament "

I must have missed that bit, its all about "influence over many areas of our lives" which I don't want. Sorry if that upsets and confuses you.
Charlie Farley @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago
These EU elections matter because (in order of importance to ordinary people):

1. they are an opportunity to express an opinion on Brown and Labour's lamentable government.

2. they are an opportunity to protest against Brown for not holding a referendum on the Lisbon (aka Constitutional) Treaty.

3. they are an opportunity to protest against the three major parties who ignore the British public by continuing a one-way march to 'ever closer union' in a nascent federal supra-national super-state.
Max Sceptic @ 66 weeks and 2 days ago