Loading... Please wait...

Vote NHS: Labour's health guarantees

WeLovetheNHSBy Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

At a press conference at Labour head office this morning, Andy Burnham launched the new VoteNHS website to support the "target cancer" campaign. The campaign aims to save up to 10,000 lives a year by backing a pledge to create a new NHS guarantee of cancer diagnosis within one week of GP referral, allowing patients to be tested and told their results in just seven days.

Burnham said that at the 2005 election, Labour promised to bring down waiting times to a 18 week maximum and to half MRSA rates. People said it could not be done, he stated. But it was achieved.

In an email to Labour supporters this afternoon, the health secretary followed up, saying:

"Some things are too important to be left to chance, and cancer is one of them. So we want to guarantee that if your doctor thinks you need a specialist cancer test, you will have it, with results, within just one week. This guarantee will save up to 10,000 lives each year.

On VoteNHS.com you can see how targets and guarantees have cut waiting lists in your area - and read how fast and effective diagnosis played a key part in people's own battles with cancer.

With so much at stake, it is time for the Tories to drop their stubborn opposition to NHS guarantees and admit that the quicker we can diagnose and treat cancer, the more lives we can save."

That final mesage was illustrated with a new image, highlighting that David Cameron would scrap the cancer guarantee:

Cameron Health

VoteNHS will support this campaign, by comparing waiting lists before and after the cancer targets and showing the improvements that have taken place in every part of the country in the past 13 years:

NHS

It also carries moving personal testimonies:

Testimony

The Party hopes VoteNHS will have as successful a reach as Ed's Pledge and the Back the Ban campaign, which 14,000 people signed up to in just one day in December.

Vote NHS

Share


Posted on Feb 09, 2010 at 03:37pm

11 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
''VoteNHS'?? This is really disgraceful - what a dimwitted attempt to play on the most populist feelings. Why not VotePeace or VoteHappiness?'

'The NHS is safe in my ... oops ... butterfingers'
Ludwig Wittgenstein @ 4 weeks and 2 days ago
'No surprise, as the election is going to be won or lost in English marginals where Cameron, according to politcalbetting.com, has established a clear advantage over New Labour simply because he is not New Labour.'

No, because Ashcroft has poured in £5m and we are still waiting to discover if this action is legal.
Ludwig Wittgenstein @ 4 weeks and 2 days ago
'VoteNHS'?? This is really disgraceful - what a dimwitted attempt to play on the most populist feelings. Why not VotePeace or VoteHappiness?
Jonathan Erskine @ 4 weeks and 2 days ago
I have been to the website only to find this little gem "The Labour Party and its elected representatives may use the data you have supplied". That is enough to stop me handing my details over.

This is straight forward political football. Not helped by the fact that Burnham is involved. If you ever want to find an example of the over promoted, you only have to look at Burnham. No wonder the NHS is screwed.
Paul 'hit or miss as to whether my comments will make it through' Pinfield @ 4 weeks and 3 days ago
A straight forward plea to 'Middle England' as this will be an England only promise.

Devolution - see? The SNP are responsible for health in Scotland and Labour / Plaid in Wales, neither have bought into New Labour's mini-market approach to health care in England.

No surprise, as the election is going to be won or lost in English marginals where Cameron, according to politcalbetting.com, has established a clear advantage over New Labour simply because he is not New Labour.
Peter Thomson @ 4 weeks and 3 days ago
The Tories have promised not to cut the NHS budget. A promise that Labour, so far, hasn't made.

Surely a government should provide the NHS with the funds it needs to manage the health system but it should be left to the professionals to decide on priorities.

Why should it be a political debating point to focus on two weeks to see a cancer specialist ? Surely the professionals should be deciding whether a blanket guarantee is the correct use of resources. If it would truly save 10,000 lives a year then why isn't it in operation currently ?

And if this guarantee (which isn't even in operation as yet) isn't met then what is the comeback for the patient ? An apology. Compensation ?

James Grant @ 4 weeks and 3 days ago
'how will uk survival rates compare to the best in europe or the usa or are we still talking process and not outcomes ?'

Are the two divisible?

The US and breast cancer: http://www.thehungersite.com/clickToGive/home.faces;jsessionid=A4DD8F51BA4042166046F2351A166780.ctg-b?siteId=2&link=ctg_bcs_home_from_ths_home_sitenav

Early Detection: Do You Know The Facts?

The National Breast Cancer Foundation estimates that each year, over 200,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and over 40,000 die. One woman in eight either has or will develop breast cancer in her lifetime. Approximately 1,700 men will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 450 will die each year.

If detected early, the five-year survival rate for breast cancer exceeds 96%. Mammograms are among the best early detection methods, yet 13 million U.S. women 40 years of age or older have never had a mammogram.

The National Cancer Institute and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommend that women in their forties and older have mammograms every one to two years. A complete early detection plan also includes regular clinical breast examinations by a trained medical professional. Monthly breast self-exams are suggested in addition.
Ludwig Wittgenstein @ 4 weeks and 3 days ago
So you are diagnosed with cancer but then NICE say that you cant have the drugs you need, unless you live in Scotland then you get them.
mushroom the dog @ 4 weeks and 3 days ago
Arf! That 'Camera On/Off' slogan is pretty good.
Charlie Farley @ 4 weeks and 3 days ago
There needs to be more personal testimonies when things like this are done, as above. You can bambuzzle the public with figures who then either turn off, don't believe or totally ignore. If you can get the people who the changes have helped, at least it puts a face to the policy and gives it a more human touch.
RED RAG ! @ 4 weeks and 3 days ago
fine the tests have been done and the diagnosis made now what ? where are the treatment centres, specialist personnel, drugs, equipment etc?
what improvement in say 5 year uk survival rates will this 'guarentee' make ?

how will uk survival rates compare to the best in europe or the usa or are we still talking process and not outcomes ?

david cheeseman @ 4 weeks and 3 days ago