By Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982
UPDATE: Peter Lilley's office says the Twitter account is not operated by him. I've asked again that he clarify his position on seal slubbing and the EU bill to ban seal products.
There's a cutting and powerful blogpost over on Letters from a Tory, which takes the form of a letter to Stockwell Day, Canada's socially conservative international trade minister who is leading the fight against the EU ban on the import of seal products.
In a damning condemnation of his party's views on animal hunting, the letter - written by a Conservative voter who describes himself as "a centre-right social conservative with hints of economic liberalism and fiscal conservativism as well" - says:
"Canada is already threatening to go to the World Trade Organization (WTO) to challenge the ban...luckily for you, the vast majority of Conservatives will support you because making a sport out of murdering animals is something that many of them hold dear."
I initially thought the letter was laced with irony, but in the manifesto for Letters from a Tory, the letter's anonymous author clearly states that "hunting with dogs should remain outlawed."
And in a post earlier this year, he wrote "the RSPCA exists because we as a society don’t think it’s good form to be needlessly cruel to animals. While the RSPCA may have its faults, their opposition to murdering animals is something that I find genuinely appealing."
This is a Conservative who believes strongly in animal welfare, and quite rightly, too.
So it's interesting to note his clear concern over his party's views on hunting in this country, of which he writes to Day:
"If you really want some help tackling the EU ban, come and have a chat with David Cameron and all his pro-foxhunting buddies who will no doubt share your concern that the disgusting, brutal and inhumane sport of clubbing baby seals to death for fun while making a few quid on the side is under threat and will jump to the rescue...if other Conservatives stay true to their cherished principle of being allowed to murder animals just for laughs then you have their undivided support."
One of those Conservative MPs picked up on the letter very quickly. Peter Lilley, the right wing Tory MP who voted against the ban on fox hunting in 2002, Tweeted (obviously more of a fan of the micro-blogging site than David Cameron) the original post's headline yesterday "Conservatives should support clubbing baby seals." Nothing more, nothing less.

As Letters from a Tory says, we are surely a society that disagrees with cruelty to animals, and as the video below shows, seal clubbing is particularly brutal.
I shall be writing to Peter Lilley, asking him to clarify asking him to clarify his position on whether he does indeed subscribe to his own Tweet that "Conservatives should support clubbing baby seals".
Does he, like his Canadian colleague, support the contiuation of this brutal activity? Or does he support the EU bill?
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
So whilst we have a law banning it, it is ineffectual. If the Tories do look like repealing it, then I'll have to look elsewhere to place my vote.
Please stop the, Tories are nasty and one-eyed baby eaters, it won't make me or others vote Labour. What your article should have been about was, that you supported the forthcoming EU directive and that you were going to sort out the fox hunting ban properly. Policies not bashing please.
Seal clubbing? so what?
Fox hunting? so what?
The UK is bankrupt and you think these things matter?
*COD*FISHING*, that is something that mattered - that mattered big time, but cod aren't fluffy or cute so canadian cod is extinct. Seals, Foxes - kill all you like there will be plenty left, it really doesn't matter... stop behaving like 5 year olds in a soft toy shop and get real... there are things that *REALLY* matter, don't divert attention from them. Every fox or seal you spend time saving is time stolen from real issues, that really matter.
Do you think if I repeat that enough it might get in one of the nationals?
I regard myself as a Cameroon; liberal paternalism for society and free markets for the economy. But the position of Fox Hunting with dogs is not something I can bring myself to support.
Would we reintroduce badger baiting or cock fighting in the name of small government and liberty? No. Controlling the fox population is fine but hunting with dogs can't be more efficient than shooting them - it's certinaly crueller and involves people taking pleasure while an animal suffers.
I've listened to fellow Conservatives try to justify this as a libertarian cause; but that's balls. Conservatism believes in the rule of law to protect the weak and vulnerable. Animals are vulnerable, even more so as they have no voice or vote.
I'm not a zealot on animal welfare; I eat meat and I've even been involved with animal testing studies. But you don't inflict suffering for the fun of it.
My only worry is the next step is to try to ban angling. I can't square my previous argument with a support for fishing yet instinctivley it feels wrong to ban angling.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2977086.stm
Peter Lilley has an ironic sense of humour?
Sorry, I'm lost here.
You've taken an issue wildly out of context, misrepresented massive and drenched it in lies.