Loading... Please wait...

Over 100,000 contacts a week: Why Labour's online campaigning will push the Tories to the Wire

Wired

By Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

UPDATE: Watch Douglas Alexander: "new media is important, but it's about having a conversation with the voters."

This month's Wired magazine, published today, has an interesting 6,000 word essay by Prospect's James Crabtree on the Conservatives' online initiatives.

Some of the apparent failings of the Tory strategy have already been highlighted, by Allegra Stratton who notes that the marginals operation led by Lord Ashcroft may not be ready in time for the election; and Will Straw who cites Joe Rospars from Crabtree's piece:

"[Rospars] questions whether the Tories really did learn the lesson of Obama’s campaign: that what matters in politics is the mobilisation of real people. “For all their data-bases and search-engine tricks, you have to ask what is the quality of interaction most people will have with the Tories during your British election. If they’re still only getting leaflets, or even emails, and not a knock on the door from a neighbour they know, then they are only halfway to getting what we did.”

I've already written that an effective online strategy requires two types of activity: communication and, perhaps more importantly, organisation, and how Labour HQ has provided the tools to enable the type of online grassroots activism — the "mobilisation of real people", as Rospars put it — that will be critical during the election campaign. To paraphrase Rishi Saha, one of the Tories' web people, online campaigning is not about building a flash website and then tempting people in as they float by doing other things on the web. The Obama campaign taught us, after all, that online campaigning should be about supporting traditional activism on the ground, and enhancing real world campaigns. 

Labour's campaign HQ now tells me that its tools are reaping real rewards in the following ways:

* 30,000 people now regularly use Labour's MembersNet connector — that's three times the number that the Tories claim use MyConservatives.com.

* Local volunteers have used MembersNet to organise 15,000 individual campaign events.

* Labour made 106,898 contacts last week, and 102,079 the previous week.

* When you factor in contacts made by phone by Labour activists using the virtual phone bank, those figures reach nearly 200,000 voter contacts per week — nearly three times as many as at a similar point during the election campaign in 2005.

The relative success of MembersNet over MyConservatives.com is largely due to Labour HQ developing its project over three years, knowing it would take time for supporters to embrace such a system. Conversely, MyConservatives.com was launched only late last year, a few months before the beginning of the short campaign.

And, significantly, the Tories have not presented any evidence that their key campaign site is driving people to take action on the party's behalf in any substantial number, while Labour's online activity is delivering good real world results.

For example, Labour HQ has built-in updates, presented in real time, which enable a dedicated team at Party HQ to phone someone who volunteers for the party within hours of their registration, to find out how they want to be involved and then point them in the direction of their nearest marginal seat. Over 300 people have turned up to volunteer at campaign events across the country in the last two weeks as a result of this new system.

New party members are also receiving often-immediate phone calls from party staff as they join online, to welcome them to the party and ask them how they might like to be involved. In one case I've heard about, this has happened even before the new member had put his credit card away upon joining.

Labour will also shortly be releasing its iPhone app — so even when activists are out campaigning, they'll be able to receive real-time updates on events, policy and the latest talking points from the campaign.

The Tories released their own iPhone app last weekend. But while its top feature is an functionally useless "swingometer" Labour’s app will include not only events listings but also a mobile virtual phone bank to allow supporters to act where it counts — in offline campaigning.

James Crabtree's piece also interestingly points out that Tim Montgomerie of ConservativeHome returned from the US and argued strongly that:

"Parties had to junk their traditional ways and instead run aggressive, attention-grabbing, single-issue online campaigns, often without party branding, which in turn could gather millions of email addresses with which to speak to voters come election time"

However, this is a technique that was never effectively implemented by the Conservatives. The only time they tried to harvest email addresses on single issue campaigns, with their infamous "Tosser" campaign in 2006, they got it badly wrong. Tory HQ ditched the campaign quickly and went back to the drawing board — and they've never really tried to apply the technique again since. The "Tosser" campaign website is now dead.

Labour, on the other hand, have been very effective at using single issues to connect with people. People in the party tell me that tens of thousands of email addresses have been harvested using campaigns such as Ed's Pledge and Back the Ban — and the party is using these to talk to people on those lists about the issues they care about. So, if you sign up to Ed's Pledge you receive emails about climate change; if you sign up to Back the Ban you receive emails about fox hunting. Nothing else.

What's more, these are some of Labour HQ's best emails, because they don't simply broadcast the latest news: every email asks people to take action — either by contacting a local candidate, writing to a local newspaper or by co-signing letters, for example.

Impressively, when Hilary Benn emailed the Back the Ban list — which gets open rates of up to 80%, way above the industry average which is below 20% — a few weeks ago to ask them to co-sign a letter to David Cameron asking for clarification on the Tories' policy on fox hunting, over 6,000 people did so within just 4 hours.

So while the Tories gain attention for the style of their web activity, consider some of the above — and that while Labour is making real headway online, it is doing so with a focus on activity that will deliver real results offline, where it will really count.

Share

Posted on Mar 04, 2010 at 08:35am


9 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
@Alex

Very inspiring!!!!!!

Thank you. Labour every day now, either on the phone or on the doorstep! So this is very encouraging and inspiring for me.

Thanks matey!
Ralph Baldwin @ 21 weeks and 1 day ago
One of the successes of the 1997 election was the rapid rebuttal unit. In an age when the electorate had not quite embraced the internet, and were still fazed with the power of mobile communication, the Conservative strategy was to fight on a basis of "this is true because we say it is" and then say it as loud as possible. The RRU meant that a Labour politician could reply with a killer fact, and irrefutable fact, that destroyed the Tory argument.

Things have changed. Now it is possible for individual activists to have that power in their pocket. I am surprised that neither of the big parties have done this. An iPhone (or better a WAP Java) app that gives quick access to important facts. For example in education: how long does it take to start a new school from scratch (to dispel the idea that if your local school is failing you can simply "start up a new school" - by the time you have done this, your kids will have left school); what are the figures of Sweden's education standards compared to the UKs (Sweden's are worse and have got worse since the plans Gove wants to introduce were introduced).

A database of simple, short facts about Tory policies will help Labour activists to build a coherent argument tailored for their area, and to be able to address individual questions as they are asked. I am surprised that such a system has not been produced. It is too late now - the software would be quite simple, the problem is the content. I made a suggestion about such a system last year but it was not taken up, although I note that ConsHome started a wiki on "Labour's failures" although it really hasn't gone too far because, well, there is not much to put on the wiki ;-)
Richard Blogger @ 21 weeks and 2 days ago
Richard

But from a Labour perspective do you think this would simply just be ignored? People just don't trust Labour - a decade of tractor production figures has seen to that.

Also do you think that this would be seen as negative campaigning by Labour?

The issue is that the roles have reversed. It appears that Labour are flinging the mud - aided by the wealthy John Prescott and driven it would seem by the former spinmeister Alistair Campbell.

What I would like to see is where is Labours positive message? What does it stand for?

Just take PMQs this week. The first planted question for the hapless Harman. Promoting industry jobs. Trouble is that Labours Andy Reed followed and his constituency has just seen the second largest emplyee announce the closure of its research centre. A few jobs are going to Cheshire but the real story is that the jobs are off overseas. When Gordon Brown launched his last policy he actually came to Loughborough and said that these were the exact jobs Labour wanted to protect and grow as they would help the country out of recession.

Do you see the disconnect?
john doe @ 21 weeks and 2 days ago
'Trouble is that Labours Andy Reed followed and his constituency has just seen the second largest emplyee announce the closure of its research centre.'

Well, it's because their patents have expired so they see no point in continuing to produce these drugs and so concentrating their business. In fact, the site will not close until the end of 2011. I have seen no reference to the jobs going overseas, just being lost as the company focuses on a core business.
Ludwig Wittgenstein @ 21 weeks and 2 days ago
Ludwig

That really isn't the reason. The closure is of a R&D site - the problem seems to be that pipeline for new drugs is running dry. AZ are likely to start more partnerships or licensing for development in the future.

Richard - good points.
john doe @ 21 weeks and 2 days ago
@ John Doe

The explanation in the Loughborough Echo is different.
Ludwig Wittgenstein @ 21 weeks and 2 days ago
"But from a Labour perspective do you think this would simply just be ignored? People just don't trust Labour - a decade of tractor production figures has seen to that."

Well, when I point out to people that a "I'll ring fence the NHS" from Cameron means cuts to NHS hospitals, with quotes from the Tory health policy documents to prove it, or that no expert thinks that an £8k insurance payment is enough to cover social care residential costs and the majority think that £20k is nearer the mark, they usually say "I didn't know that" and from that point on ways we have a potential voter. It is policies that will sink Cameron, and as the campaign heats up, his policies will start to unravel.

"Also do you think that this would be seen as negative campaigning by Labour?"

Is there any natural law against "negative campaigning"? Anyway, all elections have been fought on "vote for us because we are better than them" and when "them" have no policy details or obfuscate their policies then it is the duty of the opposing parties to point out what is being hidden. Negative campaigning is nasty campaigning, and there is a fine line, of course.

"Just take PMQs this week"

Please don't. It was embarrassing. Personally if I was Harman I would have questioned why the man who wants to be Number 2 in a Cameron government was not man enough (I am speaking as Harman, you understand...) to face me at the dispatch box. Harman got in a petty jibe about Osborne's inexperience, but not good enough. Bercow is becoming embarrassing too, he should not allow petty to-ing and fro-ing. Not that I am against a good banter, but the level from Harman yesterday was a lazy attack. If the speakers are reined in a bit more, they will be cleverer and more resourceful in their banter. That is what parliament should be about, not school yard insults.

Hague did very well. Clearly CCHQ allowed him off the leash, because it certainly showed up CMD as being just as unskilled and lazy as an orator as Harman.

"Do you see the disconnect?"

There is the same disconnect in the Tories. The challenge is not to persuade people that there is no "disconnect", the challenge is to reverse the view of "maybe it's the other lot's turn". We have to convince the public to go against this idea of British "fairplay" : "it's their turn now". It is not an easy task.
Richard Blogger @ 21 weeks and 2 days ago
Obama's online prescence had an impact because he managed to successfully engage with and motivate younger voters.

Those younger voters hadn't just had to spend 12 years listening to him talk bull**** whilst preciding over an eventually disastrous government.

Winston Smith @ 21 weeks and 2 days ago
NL must filling peoples trash folders faster than online Viagra sellers.

Moreover with this Governments history on spin it would be extremely naive to believe anything they say.

Keep spinning Alex.
john smith WB @ 21 weeks and 2 days ago