Loading... Please wait...

What we still have to learn from Obama's campaign - and policy - successes

Obama CanvassingBy Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

A year ago today, I awoke early after a night flight from Las Vegas to Chicago. That morning, the windy city was unseasonally warm, and the excitement was palpable.

I'd spent the previous 6 weeks driving across America, campaigning on the streets and the phones for the man who would be President. In the months before that, I'd spoken to people across Brooklyn throughout the primary season, on cold winter subway platforms and outside makeshift polling stations in the Super Tuesday rain. And on that November 4th, my friend and I spent the day calling voters in Illinois' neighbouring Indiana.

The night before, I was worried, I was tired and I was ratty. All I could think about were the what ifs: What if the right somehow won another term? What would that do for the world at a time of impending recession? What if McCain, who had glibly sung about "bomb-bomb-bombing Iran", was given a mandate to do so?

But the next morning, enthusiasm and expectation were so high that the Obama HQ in downtown Chicago was overflowing - literally overflowing with people who wanted to claim history in their own hands and be a part of it. My friend and I were taken by friends of the Obamas to a second campaign headquarters that had been hastily arranged to cope with the demand for volunteer space.

So it's difficult for me to let this day pass without commenting on LabourList on the anniversary of that day, and on the lessons we in the Labour party can still learn from Obama's campaign and his Presidency in that first year since his election.

Because although we may not have the same charismatic leader in our party - and we may not be able to claim the same mantle of change that Obama did after Labour's twelve years in power - we do have a lot to be proud of and a great deal to learn, still, from the way he conducted his campaign and the way he brought policy initiatives together to build an unbeatable coalition.

As I wrote for I wrote for Compass this morning:

"The Obama campaign was plural, it was grassroots and it was locally autonomous. Conversely, it was also a very traditional campaign, top-down and micro-managed from Chicago.

But that seeming contradiction was not a weakness; it was the campaign's greatest strength. Only as a coalition built of liberals and socialists, federalists and democrats, north and south, east and west, was Obama able to build such a powerful, election-winning movement, unparalleled in modern political history. Success was the result of a combination of innovative thinking, pragmatic solutions and genuinely joined-up campaigning.

Only that togetherness meant that when the chips were down, and when the right-wing attacks were plentiful, the broad left was able to come together like never before, on blogs, at rallies and in local campaigns."

Organisationally, we across the broad Labour movement - in unions, think tanks and campaign groups - can do more to pool our knowledge and resources and to share our campaigning techniques.

If we can do that, we - like the Democrats - will be able to fulfil a strong progressive agenda, just as Obama has done from the White House. In another article today for Progress, I wrote:

"President Obama has made remarkable strides in what is still a very short amount of time and under impossible circumstances of expectation and economy. Moreover, he is spending his political capital on the issues he campaigned on and the issues that matter to America. Some of these problems were seemingly intractable a year ago. Today, they are being confronted head-on.

He has wielded his progressive mandate with great timing and alacrity: 40% of the 9bn Recovery Act went directly into the pockets of working class families in tax cuts and 30,000 loans for small businesses; unemployment benefits were both increased and expanded to reach the 12 million people worst hit by the recession; 250,000 jobs were saved in the public sector; subsidised health insurance was made 65% cheaper to ensure it would continue to cover low-earners; new jobs were created with the biggest investment in infrastructure since the building of the inter-state highways in the 1950s; and there was the largest investment in education in American history."

To me, those successes - and not the relative disappointments in other areas - are what we should concentrate on as we try to hone our own campaign and policy machine over the coming months. The lessons are there for us to learn: we have to be joined-up, lay our differences aside, and not be timid in using our remaining time in this parliament to enact bold reforms.

Tonight, we'll be discussing some of those lessons and how we can apply them in our local branch meeting. Because if we are to win next spring - and we can still win - we need to get started now.


Posted on Nov 04, 2009 at 03:22pm

12 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
BTW I have just had a rather tawdry reply 'from' the PM's Office after the closing of the very popular online No 10 petition asking him to resign. The response is:

The Prime Minister is completely focussed on restoring the economy, getting people back to work and improving standards in public services. As the Prime Minister has consistently said, he is determined to build a stronger, fairer, better Britain for all.

David Honour @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
Hi Alex,

I think that too much is made of the campaign aspect of Obama's success. There was a huge groundswell for change in the US because Bush tied one hand behind his own back, shot himself in both feet and then stuffed one foot firmly in his mouth. In other words Bush lost the election as much as Obama won it.

Can you see any lessons for Labour in the above??
David Honour @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
Hi Labourlist

The best way is to tell the truth .

No live chat for PMQS Alex ?

ricki
ricki lake @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
Alex

Ignoring the obvious elephants in the room you have ignored one fundamental. Money.

Obama had lots of it. Labour has none. Technically they are bankrupt, being underwritten by an increasingly bellicose union. The Tories on the other hand are well organised, well managed and well funded.

After tonights events with my local Labour party and MP I will be doing everything in my power to ensure the situation stays that way as well.



john doe @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
"Tonight, we'll be discussing some of those lessons and how we can apply them"

Alex, at some point you and the party are going to have to get serious and address the elephant in the room. Gordon Brown is a disaster, universally loathed, weak, dithering and cowardly. His replacement should be your number one priority, he will not, under any circumstances, win the next election. Its head out of the sand time, its either Brown or the party but they can't both survive.
Charlie Farley @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
"He has wielded his progressive mandate with great timing and alacrity: 40% of the 9bn Recovery Act went directly into the pockets of working class families in tax cuts and 30,000 loans "for small businesses; unemployment benefits were both increased and expanded to reach the 12 million people worst hit by the recession"

Excellent. And what did Grumpy Brown and Darling do with our money? Gave it to the bankers for their Christmas bonus. Classic!
mike slater @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
Don't worry, I won't be doing anything rash. I may vote for my sitting Labour MP, he's a good sort and didn't get caught with his expenses down but there's always the chance that The Grumpy One will see my vote as a mandate and we can't have that.
Charlie Farley @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
The first point is fair, and I tried to acknowledge that by saying:

"Because although we may not have the same charismatic leader in our party - and we may not be able to claim the same mantle of change that Obama did after Labour's twelve years in power - we do have a lot to be proud of and a great deal to learn, still, from the way he conducted his campaign and the way he brought policy initiatives together to build an unbeatable coalition."

I'm not trying to promote a language transfer. I'm not trying to promote a complete translation at all, in fact.

On the second question, it was asked a lot by family and people here, but actually much less often in the US than you'd think. Americans are very proud of their system, and their heritage of outsiders joining in their journey. Most people were genuinely supportive and welcoming and actually there was a big feeling that world feeling was more important in last year's election than any before it. So I always framed my campainging as a "yes, I wasn't born here, but I have lived and worked here and I do know the impact these elections have on the world as a whole and I think it's important to articulate that". So most people said it was great that their democracy was so involving. Plus, because I was there for 15 months I genuinely felt a part of it, and when I explained that, even the doubters understod.

I think the recipocal relationship is also quite common. I've met quite a few Americans on Labour doorsteps here.
Alex Smith @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
Alex, two things strike me about this post. Firstly, Obama was offering change from a deeply unpopular government. At the next election, Labour are the incumbents and are deeply unpopular. The change agenda cannot work, because if you now talk to me about change, I will ask you why you are proposing to change what you have spent 12 years building.

The second thing thats struck me, and this is more a question than a thought, how was a none US citizen received when campaigning for Obama? I ask because, if an American flew over to the UK and knocked on my door to urge me to vote for Brown, Cameron or Clegg, I would have some questions for him as to why he was interfering in another country's democratic process. I know that Bush was vastly unpopular, but still... It seems a little odd to me.
Paul 'hit or miss as to whether my comments will make it through' Pinfield @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
Charley - don't jump or cut your wrists you are still too young..... :-)

You could always go for Nick Clegg and the Libdums!

At least, up here, I have Wee Eck as a more traditionalist Scottish socialist option........OK, with a small 's' - who does things like reverse Labour's privatisation of the NHS in Scotland... LOL.
Peter Thomson @ 13 weeks and 5 days ago
But Obama offered hope, all we are offered is four more clunking years of inept misery, corruption and mediocrity. That or Dave Cameron. What a fantastic choice.
Charlie Farley @ 13 weeks and 6 days ago
"Because if we are to win next spring - and we can still win "

Yes, Alex. If you say so.

TGhe trouble with Obama is that a year in and heigh-ho, he has, through his own stupidity, landed himself with his own Vietnam.

The tragedy for us is that unlike Harold Wilson who had the gusts to tell Lyndon Johnson where to go when he wanted to involve us in his adventures, we have an obsequious fawning New Labour party who when told to jump meekly say "how high, Mr President?". Harold had more brains and guts in his little finger than the whole cabinet have in their collective body.
Alan Giles @ 13 weeks and 6 days ago