Loading... Please wait...

Mission accomplished - now let's look to the rest of the world

GlobalBy Kevin Peel / @kevpeel

Ok, so it’s not exactly true. We haven’t completely accomplished the mission here at home (excuse the Bush-ism by the way) yet. As friends and colleagues of mine in other articles have said (far more eloquently I might add), we’ve still got a lot of work to do on trans rights, we need to equalise the rights of ‘married’ heterosexual and homosexual couples (though my personal opinion is that we need to be less focused on what it is called and more focused on getting the protections) and we need an urgent strategy from the Government to tackle homophobic bullying, which seems to be endemic in our schools.

However, for the most part, the decades of struggle by committed LGBT activists has paid off. We’ve got an equal age of consent, gay couples can adopt children, homophobic discrimination at work and in the provision of goods and services has been outlawed, the gender recognition act means trans people can have their true gender recognised under law, civil partnerships give lesbian and gay couples (almost) equal rights as heterosexual married couples, lesbian couples have equal access to NHS fertility treatment and we’re currently putting a shiny new Equality Bill through Parliament to tie it all together with a big bow on top.

We now need to be looking to other countries and saying ‘Why haven’t you got that?’

67 countries (don’t quote me on that) have now signed the UN’s Declaration on the Decriminalisation of Homosexuality, a groundbreaking (but nonbinding) measure put forward in December 2008 which condemned human rights violations based on homophobia. I was proud that the UK led the charge on this. It was the first time gay rights have ever been discussed in the 192 member General Assembly of the UN and marks an important point in the recognition of the world wide struggle for LGBT equality. However, it had to be proposed as a nonbinding measure because there was not enough support for an official resolution. Homosexuality is still banned in nearly 80 countries and punishable by death in 6. Including Saudi Arabia, a country I’m ashamed that we call an ally.

Closer to home, in the last 2 weeks the Lithuanian Parliament overwhelmingly voted in favour of introducing a law to ban the discussion of homosexuality in schools and to ban any mention of it in any public material that could be seen by children. LGBT people in countries like Bulgaria and Russia are frequently subject to homophobic attacks and discrimination and Pride parades in countries across Eastern Europe are often banned, LGBT communities oppressed and rights prohibited.

The EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency published a report in March which said that discrimination, harassment and violence against LGBT people is ‘widespread’ across the EU. This flies in the face of EU human rights law and the Charter on Fundamental Rights.

Our own MEP Michael Cashman and the LGBT Intergroup he presides over in the European Parliament is doing fantastic work to highlight instances of inequality and prejudice wherever they occur, but the European Parliament doesn’t have the teeth to take necessary action to prevent it. We need to be putting forward proposals to give more power to our democratically elected European Parliament so that it can act to prevent such flagrant abuse of the values and principles of the European Union.

But we can’t just pass the buck to the UN or to Europe. Our own Government needs to be speaking out more against countries oppressing their citizens and stifling basic freedoms. The Foreign & Commonwealth Office is doing some great work through the diplomatic service and I was proud to see our embassies flying the pride flag on 17th May (International Day Against Homophobia), but we need to start getting tough with countries who think it is ok to treat LGBT people as second class citizens. The softly softly approach only works if you can back it up with a big stick.

The UK is a shining example of a progressive society moving the equality agenda forward and tackling discrimination. We’ve taken the lead on advancing LGBT rights beyond anything anyone thought was possible 20 years ago. We need to challenge those countries in Europe and across the rest of the world to do the same.

Posted on Jul 05, 2009 at 10:06am

3 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
Very happy thank you but I think your consideration of my well being is false.

More people attend church than are gay in UK. Your sarcasm is lost on me, perhaps you have no idea about our laws, monarchy and links to the church.
I do not think that I am being unkind - perhaps a Muslim country could allow me to walk with my shoudlers showing or allow me to visit a temple in UK with figure hugging clothing. Or would that ruin your petty arguement?

I can't see in my earlier post the revelation that I am Chrsitian...that's your assumption.

Men and women participating in anal sex would only be at risk if one had the virus through same sex with someone who had practised same sex sex.

Nils we have all been tennagers and we all have the same hormonal feelings, however I never experienced fears that's simply ridiculous. I see sex education as instructing youngers and certainly not young primary school children about emotions and the mechanics. Just as I want schools to teach evolution and not creationism I would not want information on and about LGBT relationships to be presented to my children.

You really have a cheek to tell me that gay people are fine with my sexuality (whatever that might be as I have not stated it), that certainly is thier right but I do not have to be happy about LGBT events, news, lobbys and issues.

Just as I don't care for the Bigstreetparty it's just not of interest to me and millions in this country...that is until it affects and limits my family, my children, and my professional life.


Katherine Normandy @ 31 weeks and 1 day ago
Why are you so angry Katherine ?

England is a Christian country - really - there's me thinking that it was only a VERY small minority that went to church - maybe comparable to the number of gay people - maybe not though - I can't get upset by it. You might NOT want single sex church recognised marriages - but clearly some people do - why be unkind to them ? - it's no skin off your nose or my nose is it ?

I was married in a registry office by the way to a woman (I'm a man) - because I didn't want the hypocrisy of going to a place of worship to a God I didn't believe to validate our union. Personally I can't understand why gay people (or anyone else) would want to associate with bigoted organisations like churches - but that's one of the freedoms that are the hallmark of a civilised society - I don't deny you the right to be Christian - why should you deny gay people the right to be ?

I don't think anyone wants to receive contaminated blood products, but I wonder whether women who take part in anal sex with men would be on your list of people you wouldn't want blood from ? As far as I can see they have just as much chance as gay men of being HIV positive. I think you'd have a very difficult time finding out to be honest.

As for it being a risk that you're not willing to take - the next time you need a blood transfusion, I bet you'll take the risk - I bet you will, because you really won't know where the blood's come from, and you probably won't care.

I find it odd as well that people think that gay people are out to "promote" gayness - like it's some sort of recruitment campaign. Millions of young people have suffered because of a lack of knowledge and understanding surrounding their sexuality and their fears and prejudices as they reach maturity - sex education is there to help overcome those fears, and help people to reach adulthood with a confidence in themselves irrespective of their sexual orientation.

You can't be "expansionist" on being gay - however slick the presentation, however attractive the merchandise, straight people will still be straight - and gay people are fine with that (and I'm sorry if I'm being presumptuous by talking on behalf of gay people - but that's the way it seems to me).

Don't worry - be happy !
Nils Boray @ 31 weeks and 1 day ago
So what exactly is your mission?

By the very fact that the minute LBGT population want to be identified as different makes the hair stand up on the necks of the majority.
Just because a percentage of school children do not use ruc sacs does not mean that an anti-ruc sac clause should appear in the bullying policy.
Many people are losing their patience on this subject and I am one.

England is a Christian country, we do NOT want single sex church recognised marriages.

I do not want to recieve blood products donated by prostitutes, hepatitis or STD sufferers, those with CJD nor from men who sleep with men.

This is not me being selfish and trying to spoil your fun it's an obvious risk that I am not willing to take.

The use of the word progressive on this site is a concern as you refer to progession for a VERY small minority (5% - 4% male, 1% female in the most recent report) and the degression, curtailment, delay, hindrance, impediment, stoppage and blockage of the majority.

In no way do I condone Saudi Arabia's stance in the banning of homosexuality but it's promotion in UK is totally wrong. If my children were to attend a class on it's promotion then I would disallow them from attending. I am no bigot but I don not want them to be taught about same sex sexual intercourse or how to make the best outfit for pride.
Katherine Normandy @ 31 weeks and 1 day ago