Boris Johnson’s new year fare increase is the clearest indication yet of what is wrong with his administration. He is a mayor with no clear vision for our capital, who nonetheless costs Londoners dear. In the process he tells us something about what a Tory government would be like. Like David Cameron’s inheritance tax cut, Boris Johnson looks after the interests of a few whilst making the majority pay.
In a few days time Londoners will return to work to be hammered hard with what the Financial Times has described as the biggest real-terms fare increase in Transport for London’s history. This follows hard on the heels of his 6% increase last year. Though Boris Johnson may have seemed amusing, the joke isn’t funny anymore.
The sheer scale of the increase is breathtaking. It is as if we have gone back in a time warp to days of Thatcher and Major. Once again investment is being cut, some services may be run down, but fares are going through the roof. It is a classic Tory fares policy.
Next week a single bus journey by Oyster will soar by 20% to £1.20. It means that the price of a single bus journey by Oyster will have risen by a third since Boris Johnson was elected – from 90p to £1.20. A weekly bus pass will shoot up by 20%, to £16.60.
Though Boris Johnson claims to speak for outer London he will hit many commuters in the suburbs hard. A six-zone peak single Tube fare by Oyster will rise by 10.5% to £4.20, and a five-zone off-peak single Tube fare - outside Zone 1 – will rocket by 18.2% to £1.30. And Boris Johnson is committed to further annual above-inflation fare increases.
Within this harsh new regime, a considerable amount of the burden will be passed to bus users. Overall tube fares will rise 3.9%, whilst overall bus fares will rise by 12.7%. But both sets of rises are way above inflation.
n attack on the affordability of public transport services will price some Londoners off these services. Many others will simply have to bear the pain. Either way it is the exact opposite of what hard-working Londoners need.
Boris Johnson will no doubt try to blame someone else. But the reality is that he is raising money by hiking fares - rather than keeping the Western extension of the congestion charge or by charging extra for gas guzzlers. Johnson's decision to remove the western extension of the congestion charge has lost London £70 million a year from its future transport budgets. He axed the £25 charge for the most polluting cars driving into central London, protecting polluters but costing London a projected £50million a year.
Perhaps Boris Johnson thinks that the fare increases he is imposing are of little consequence. Remember this is someone who thinks a £250,000 salary for churning out a Daily Telegraph column is "chicken feed". This is the mayor who devotes his time to defending bankers and opposing tax changes that will make sure those on the highest incomes contribute a fairer share during the recession. It is small wonder that he is so careless with the finances of London’s transport users when his priority is to look after the interests of the most privileged.
London was the only major city in the world to successfully get people out of cars and onto public transport in the last decade. Johnson threatens that progress.
Boris Johnson represents a problem for David Cameron on two fronts. By pandering to his own party’s right wing base over the Lisbon Treaty or tax policy he causes divisions within Tory ranks and fuels speculation that he hankers after David Cameron’s job. And by his actions in looking after the most well-off but hitting hard-working people in the pocket he illustrates what a Tory government would look like.
But most importantly it is Londoners themselves who are paying the price. London Labour members will be campaigning hard against this unjust and unnecessary fare increase, which says everything we need to know about whose interests the Conservative Party represents.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Does anyone honestly think that chuntering poshos like her have any idea of how the rest of us live?
I think that Gordon will be very surprised when I tell him.
When you entered Parliament in those halcyon days just four short years ago, so charged with hope and idealism, you can't, even in your wildest nightmares have thought it would end like this: having to write - or even have written for you - some Tory-bashing-by-numbers attack on Boris that you know to be tribal and specious.
At least, when you were a lawyer, you - presumably - had a more scrupulous regard for the truth.
The fact that just 11 people could be bothered to reply to this tired and dishonest diatribe must mark a lowpoint for you.
Is this why you came into politics?
Surely not.
Coming back from your triumphs at Copenhagen you want to slag off the bloke that's trying to clear up Ken's old carp.
The Labour government will be slashing billions off public expenditure and you worry about 20p on a bus fare.
Well 'scuse me for thinking you're at the cutting edge of policy making on this one. You're as bad as that boring old Simon Fletcher.
£1.20 is about par for a lot of small towns I'd say so why the uproar?
@Guy
And (as much as it pains me) Guy's got a point (only joking Guy). Why should the council tax payers subsidise transport users? Everything has to be paid for one way or another.
@Emily
Emily, not a great post I'm afraid. Trying to chuck in IHT and the Lisbon Treaty when it's supposed to be about increased transport costs just made me think you are clutching at straws.
Final question for you Emily, if Ken was so good for the people of London, why did they get rid of him?
Another great demonstration of why London gets little sympathy from the rest of the country.
Great own goal. Suggest you give up politics and try something else. We need great politicians and new ideas not tribalism.
Do you have any new ideas? I'm all ears.
I have spent a lot of time reflecting on what my views are and the thing that struck me was that new thinking is not what we need but an agreement on a pragmatic agenda. I will propose a caring society that looks after its citizens and offers opportunity to those who wish to grasp it.
GuyM - Emily clearly doesn't like democracy. The western congestion charge was opposed by the majority in consultation and despite the bleating of TFL, who grew fat on Livingstone's watch, the scrapping of it was widely welcomed.
Either you pay for things such as transport (by pay I mean subsidise) through taxation or you pay through direct charges.
The other side of the coin in this case is that council tax will be frozen if the Tories win and Boris' charge on London councils kept down.
Hence Council Tax which has risen by disgusting rates under Labour will be pegged back.
So which is fairer, make those who use the transport network pay the right rate for its use or make everyone pay through council tax for a transport service they may not even use.
For those of us living in "outer London" I'd rather pay lower council tax, use my car when I want and pay the true cost of public transport when I travel into the city.
I suspect most of Boris' core vote in the suburbs feel exactly the same. Anyone who knows what London buses can be like in the inner city areas will know why most of us in the suburbs would never get a bus to London.
Train, tuve or bus in my very local area is all I use. Shopping is by car, as is the way for most of the people living near me. We do not want to be subsidising inner London residents transport options.
If you want to get on a bus or tube then pay the going rate and not expect the rest of us to pay for you through our taxation.
Also this rubbish about "hard working people", do you really think those of us in outer London on above average wages aren't "hard working"? Seriously stop denigrating anyone not in your narrow core vote and stop trying to continually fleece us of every penny you can.
Back from the sham of copenhagen? I live in london and 20 years ago as a child i could get a bus journy for 25p , Fast forward to now it cost £2 (without a oyster) even if you are only going 3 or 4 stops , I also note this peice is from a pro class war suporter, I am sure when mayor Livingstone was in power fares never went up , congestion fell , and all his policys where coherent with the New Labour goverment (You know heathrow 3rd runway while we are preached that we must cut carbon, By the way , What plane did the writter fly on to denmark? Prince charles private jet? Or the one that Mr Brown chartered? Or the one that other ministers/Hangers on /journolist flew on? ) .
Danny
Ps Happy new year Alex and all labourlist readers/bloggers