Loading... Please wait...

Labour's plans to protect public services in Lambeth

Coop

By Cllr Steve Reed

The Labour Government and Conservative and Lib Dem parties nationally have signalled significant cuts in public spending after the general election. The cuts facing local councils could be greater than 20% overall, despite some health and education services being protected. This means all councils are looking at how they can deliver services differently in future – either by reducing the cost, charging more, rationing services only to the most needy, or closing services down.

The Tories in Barnet have come up with a plan to offer no-frills public services along the lines of budget airlines like Ryanair. What that means is minimal or sub-standard services offered to most people with better services only available to people wealthy enough to pay more for them.

That kind of two-tier, pay-twice Tory model is unacceptable to a progressive Labour council like Lambeth. We are developing a different model that aims to protect high quality affordable services for everyone. We want to achieve this by empowering the community with more involvement in delivering some public services.

Lambeth’s Labour council has already been pursuing this community agenda since 2006. We have opened the country’s first – and so far only – parent-promoted secondary school, a community-led alternative to an academy. We have more tenant-managed estates, a cooperative model, than any other local authority. We are leading nationally on the personalisation of care budgets, handing control to care users. We are working towards the country’s biggest asset transfer by setting up a community trust to take control of the Old Lilian Baylis school site in Kennington and run it as a community sport and youth hub. We run some cutting edge environmental programmes that give tools to local communities to transform blighted public spaces and promote sustainable living. And with Coin Street Community Builders on the South Bank, Lambeth is home to one of the country’s biggest and most successful cooperatives.

Reductions in funding mean we need to drive this agenda forward even faster. What’s common to all these initiatives is that citizens take control. The model draws on the cooperative values of fairness, accountability and responsibility so we are calling the model the ‘cooperative council’. It’s these underlying values that will be key to shaping a new settlement between the citizen and public services that will help protect frontline provision.

Cabinet Office minister Tessa Jowell has been advocating a role for modern mutuals within a reshaped public sector and, as a Lambeth MP, she has been hugely supportive of our work locally. It goes without saying that cooperatives and other models of mutual provision have a long and proud tradition in the history of the Labour movement.

We believe this cooperative model will protect frontline services from cuts that would otherwise result from central government funding cuts. It works by empowering citizens and communities to take more responsibility for running some services themselves, freeing up resources to guarantee services for the most vulnerable. In some cases that means allowing people to set up cooperatives to run local services, in others it means giving the community the tools they need to do the job. That not only saves money, it helps build stronger communities, local leadership, and more flexible services that meet local needs.

Lambeth will consult our public-sector partners about our plans in March. We will also set up a Citizens' Commission to involve residents and service users in discussions about this new way of delivering public services. The Commission will report back in April. If Labour wins the council elections in May we will finalise agreements with partners by July so we can launch Lambeth as Britain’s first co-operative council in August.

The Commission will explore a range of ideas and ways of taking things forward. These are not set in stone, but may include:

* An ‘active citizens’ dividend’ that could reward residents who are involved with organisations that help deliver community-based services with a council tax rebate.

* Neighbourhood cooperatives – allowing residents in a given ward or neighbourhood to run local community facilities.

* Citizen-led services – allowing service users or local residents to ballot on turning certain local services into local cooperatives, such as children’s centres or youth centres.

* Supporting more housing cooperatives under residents’ control and ownership.

It is clear that all council services – indeed all public services – will face spending cuts over the next few years. Tory councils like Barnet or Hammersmith and Fulham are using this as an opportunity to sell assets, cut services and make quality services available only to those wealthy enough to pay for them. Conversely, Labour in Lambeth is developing a progressive alternative that seeks to shape a new settlement between the citizen and public services, championing public ownership instead of privatisation but without the dead hand of old-style statism.

By empowering communities and service users and offering them more responsibility we can protect frontline services and build stronger and more cohesive communities at the same time. It’s a response anchored in the traditional Labour values of cooperation and mutualism that offers a chance to reshape public services for the better.

Steve Reed is Leader of the Labour Council in Lambeth.

Share

Posted on Feb 18, 2010 at 08:28am


18 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
Ian- I also hear DC has been telling local councils to act as they mean to go on- or something similar.They are certainly proving a point! Let us hope the electorate can put 2+2 together...

Jo.
Hazico 28 @ 23 weeks and 1 day ago
Yes Ian- I think very important to compare; it does indeed hilight differences in priorities!

Sorry must go now for today.

Jo.
Hazico 28 @ 23 weeks and 1 day ago
just a thought labour controlled Sandwell announced a balanced budget, 0% council tax rise and no redunacies

Neighbouring Tory/lib Birmingham, 2000 job cuts and £70m defeict, Neighbouring Tory Wolverhampton, cut old folks homes, job losses, neighbouring Tory Walsall, £16m defeict, job losses
ian robathan @ 23 weeks and 1 day ago
PS- I'd love to see this model adopted elsewhere, and here in the Midlands.It is the way forward!

Jo.
Hazico 28 @ 23 weeks and 1 day ago
John-

My opinion has been based on credible media reporting from the BBC Politics Show, The Nottingham Evening Post,Radio 4, and Jon Cruddas' Tory Stories- which have been well researched.

I appreciate you may have had first hand experience working with them, and have your own preference and opinion in politics, which you've made clear on these pages your dislike for Labour.

You have been equally scathing about Labour locally- despite the fact that Notts has traditionally been Labour supported by most of the electorate here? (Is it about 25 years- I'm not sure.)

Similar things are happening at now Conservative Derbyshire CC, although it appears not so extreme.

I am not able to comment on specific economics, but I certainly am about priorities.So mine would be sensible economic policy whilst crucially providing high quality public services, and protecting the most vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and disabled.That would be paramount.It is about servicing the community.

The BBC commented it was social care for the elderly that had been one of the hardest hit, as well as thousands of jobs earmarked.Meanwhile- improving council buildings and offices in the same breath!

"Tory Stories" has questioned whether Tory ideology is being rigidly adhered to over pragmatic and fair policy.

If as a council their measures had not been so extreme, how come they are making the prime time BBC News with their cuts and job losses for years to come?

Anyway- only able to make a brief comment today.

Jo.
Hazico 28 @ 23 weeks and 1 day ago
Jo

How many times are you going to have a go at Notts CC despite not giving the true story?

I ask yet again - what would you cut so that Notts CC can balance its books after the Labour council overspent so much?

john doe @ 23 weeks and 1 day ago
great idea, exactly the kind a modern left leaning party should be looking at

Now if at national level we bring out policies like that I am sure we would gain more support, because unlike what the Tories think ,the majority in this country see fair social justice as a way forward.

we have seen what uncaring capitalism and free markets lead to
ian robathan @ 23 weeks and 1 day ago
Sorry- I've only just found this.It sounds absoloutely wonderful,and the right way to go.If only others followed suit!
I will have to re read and digest later.

I wonder how this compares to councils hilighted on the Tory Stories website, including Nottingham CC- now in the national news for the huge scale of cuts to job planned?

Could this be ideology over necessity for scale of cuts?

Meanwhile- this is a greatly inspiring model!

Jo.
Hazico 28 @ 23 weeks and 1 day ago
The "enabling" aspect cheers me. Very good.
Ralph Baldwin @ 23 weeks and 1 day ago
Good discussion starter if nothing else.

There could be some scope to deliver additional services using this model, such as the Lillian Bayliss youth centre, where a vaccuum exists but one has to remember that there isn't always a ready supply of people in the community with the spare time to devote to delivering services, the old adage that good people are busy people because they are relied upon to get things done is often accurate.

Where this capacity exists then the model could be useful.

But if this is about replacing current service delivery methods in order to save money as the article suggests then you may have the perverse situation of workers being punted from their jobs because unpaid volunteers are prepared to do the work which shifts the costs off the councils' books.

Finally there doesn't seem to be any rationale for turning existing local authority services into co-operatives, such as youth centres or children's centres; they are already accountable to locals and the involvement of the local community shouldn't require a change of structure.

Clearly there needs to be more detail on the proposals and how they would benefit and involve the community, including the impact on the existing workforce, the large majority who live in the borough.

Eamon O'Hearn Large @ 23 weeks and 2 days ago
I'm in Lambeth and to be honest I'm pretty pleased with the council. You can see that they've always got loads of initiatives underway as you make your way around the borough.

It does have a very different feel to an "easyCouncil approach" though.

(Very anecdotally, my two best mates work for Lambeth and they're full of tales about how massively cushy life is in Lambeth versus the private sector)

Overall, I'm supportive of Lambeth's John Lewis approach. At least it will give us a good point of comparison versus the easyCouncil approach. That is if we can remain mature enough to make non-Partisan observations.
Jason Bradley @ 23 weeks and 2 days ago
Sue

If the council have adopted the road then they have a statuary obligation to provide a decent road surface. Failure to provide this can and does result in significant compensation claims*

Can I suggest that the estate forms a committee and petitions the council. Remember that many councils spend any remaining budget before April (hence why so many roads get "dressed" in March) so you may have a chance.





* after the winter snow most roads are in a dire state and I'm having my wheels inspected for damage as a result. I have already had to buy a new set of alloys due to buckling and I won't be paying again
john doe @ 23 weeks and 2 days ago
I'm paying a premium price to my Labour council AND getting a sub-standard service.

The people on my road have offered to put up the money to have our estate road resurfaced, as it's not been done for 30 years, and is dangerous, but the council say we're not allowed to do this because of `health and safety'. We'd rather pay less council tax and pay for services ourselves.
Sue Kirby @ 23 weeks and 2 days ago
"We have opened the country’s first – and so far only – parent-promoted secondary school, a community-led alternative to an academy."

Excellent. This sounds like just the sort of initiative which Michael Gove wants to promote after the next election!
Mark Cannon @ 23 weeks and 2 days ago
I sound idea is a sound idea, whatever the political affilliation of the person proposing it. However, the question I would like Steve to answer, is why did some parent in a Labour controlled authority feel the need to set up their own school?
Owen Ramsay @ 23 weeks and 2 days ago
The Swedish system will not work in the UK, new research suggests.

FT comment

Telegraph comment

Centre for School Design

Independent comment
Ludwig Wittgenstein @ 23 weeks and 2 days ago
Outsourcing

Criticism by the Audit Commission that some councils which outsource services (especially for the elderly) do not monitor those services properly - they are just intent on disposing of the service - and in some cases are simply paying too much.
Ludwig Wittgenstein @ 23 weeks and 2 days ago
Steve,

Many of us council candidates will be watching with very great interest. Well done for taking on this bold move and it will be very interesting to see how it manifests.

Thanks.
Ralph Baldwin @ 23 weeks and 2 days ago