Loading... Please wait...

To really understand the war, the Iraq inquiry needs to take evidence from the ground

Iraq MarketBy Gary Kent

Given the huge investment that this country made in the lives of its soldiers and in public money, it is only right that there should be a comprehensive inquiry into the causes and conduct of the military intervention in Iraq in order to learn the lessons for the future.

Labour Friends of Iraq was founded by supporters and opponents of that intervention, but who deliberately sought to respond to the new Iraq that emerged from the intervention. For the last five years our priority has been working with Iraqis who are seeking to build independent organisations such as trade unions and to create a federal and democratic country.

The sad thing about much of the discussion about Iraq is that it either ignores or obscures the reality of Saddam’s murderous regime or that Iraqi voices are invisible in that debate. My worry is that a large number of activists have little or no knowledge of the crimes of the previous Iraqi regime which include genocide against Iraqi Kurds, massacres of Shias in the south and external aggression in which about a million people died.

It is important that the inquiry recognises that this story didn’t start with the invasion, but that it nevertheless examines this suffering of the Iraqi people under Saddam. For those reasons, it should take evidence in Iraq.

After five trips to Iraq since 2006, I would say that many Iraqis welcomed the intervention, especially in Kurdistan which had benefited for 12 years from the US and the UK policing a no-fly zone for Iraqi bombers and gunships over the Kurdistan Region. Many people were deeply angered by the litany of errors committed after the intervention, which gave vent to Shia fundamentalists, Baa’thist die-hards anxious to protect their former privileged position of dominance and Al-Qaeda.

Iraq came very near to full-scale civil war but security has vastly improved and its sovereign government is increasingly taking charge of its own security. There are still problems with delivering public services, in relations between the central government in Baghdad and the Kurds and with the country’s neighbours. There is a desperate need for foreign investment and trade as well as all sorts of cultural, political and social contacts to overcome the legacy of decades of neglect and destruction of the economy as well as Iraq’s isolation from the outside world.
 
British troops are on the way out but we now need a new, deep, long-term strategic relationship between Iraq and Britain based on political, diplomatic and economic issues. By all means, let’s examine how we got here but let’s also make a greater effort to work with the new Iraq in their interests and ours.

Gary Kent is Director of Labour Friends of Iraq.

Posted on Jun 16, 2009 at 11:20am

13 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
Yes Guy M, they would have. At the time the British left apologized for Hitler and spoke out against going to war.
James - Man of the Right @ 33 weeks and 6 days ago
It will be another whitewash as they all are, i hope Blair, Cambell, and all the legal bods who were complicite in it will be called, one witness i feel should be called is the widow of Dr David Kelly,the way that man was treated by no 10 still makes my blood boil.
martin lewis @ 33 weeks and 6 days ago
So that we the electorate can REALLY understand the war the enquiry has to be IN PUBLIC not hidden away just as Gordon wants.
And where was he when Blair pulled the wool over the dummy cabinet's eyes?
William Silver @ 33 weeks and 6 days ago
If all of those reasons were valid, why were we lied to about WMD's, why not just tell the truth and have the backing of the British people?
lee Matthews @ 33 weeks and 6 days ago
It had every business getting involved.

Zimbabwe hasn't invaded it's neighbours or used WOMD on it's own people etc.

You would no doubt also have sat back and let hitler take poland etc. as the UK had "no business getting involved"
Guy M @ 33 weeks and 6 days ago
Gary,

All I care about is how big were the lies that this government told the British people as a pretext to war?

That is all.
Mike Thomas @ 34 weeks ago
Guy, this Government did not remove Saddam. That was done by the USMC and the good 'ol boys under the Head Cowboy. The peace was botched because Bush had no idea about the internecine warfare between the various Ba'ath Party factions and the Lads from Tikriti. Also, Bush had no idea about the endemic hatred between the Shia and the Sunni (hell, he didn't even know what a Shia or Sunni was). Saddam's iron rule kept everyone in line. But when he went the lid came off. Middle East experts were warning Bush about this for months before the war.

The war aims of GWI were met when Saddam was thrown out of Kuwait. There was no UN mandate to march on Baghdad and the coalition would have broken up had Bush Senior attempted regime change in 1991.

Regardless of Saddam's tyrannical reign afterwards, the UK had no business getting involved. It was all about Bush and the Neo-Cons wanting to clear the way for a set-to with Iran (and of course the oil).

Ask yourself why we haven't invaded Zimbabwe.
Sam Francisco @ 34 weeks ago
Of course this is being held behind closed doors. There still might be National Security implications. But much of the data around this matter is already out in the Public Domain, newspapers, magazine articles and around the 'Internet'.

It could be suggested that the secrecy is to avoid public embarrassment of people like Teflon B'Liar, Pa McRuin-Broone, Lord Meddlesome and others of that Ilk.

As for the rest of us Peasants of the UK. We will just have to be grateful for whatever crumbs falls from High Table of Our Liege Lords and Ladies of McGubbins-Broone's demented Stalineque parody of a Gubber-munt.

Don't expect much out of this inquiry. Its finding have already been written and are locked away in some dark office in Whitehall. (all allegedly of course)
TumbleWeedNumpty !! @ 34 weeks ago
Hi Gary,

are you writing in your capacity as advisor to the Islamic Dawa Party of Iraq? If so, could you inform us how much Nouri al-Maliki is paying you? I think you should give this evidence in public.
Gerard Killoran @ 34 weeks ago
About the only thing I've really supported about this Labour government is that they removed Saddam.

His regime had invaded Kuwait and Iran, fired missile on Israel, Suadi arabia and threatened other gulf states.

They had tried to develop WOMD (biological, chemicla and nuclear) and had used chemical and biological weapons on their own populace.

Hunderd's of thousands had been executed by Saddam's regime and yet the War was opposed solely on anti-US grounds.

Talk to an Iraqi about the situation, especially the Kurds and marsh Arabs and all will say it was a great day when Saddam was removed.

The issue is NOT about why we went to war, it really is about why the "peace" was so botched in the aftermath of Saddam's fall. It is redolent of so much of NuLabour though, appalling planning and control.
Guy M @ 34 weeks ago
Let's send Tony and Gordon over there on a "fact finding" mission to informally mingle with the jubilant liberated Iraqis. Fallujah should do the trick.
Old Holborn @ 34 weeks ago
The Iraq inquiry needs to take evidence from the ground. You mean like a soil sample?
John Hirst @ 34 weeks ago
Excellent article Gary.

For a long time I have been utterly dismayed that the left who would not hesitate to jump up and down all day over some Oxford undergraduate telling a racist joke would happily ignore vile abuses of human rights abroad just so long as the perpetrator was an enemy of the America.

The western left has ignored the Iraqi left, the trade unionists and in fact the whole lot of them, preferring to share platforms with the fascist Muslim brotherhood instead. They have almost no understanding of what life was like Saddam nor they have any concept of the value of liberty and freedom, much less democracy. Yet most extraordinary of all Britain has great numbers of Iraqi immigrants and exiles who are enthusiastic about the west removing Saddam. Sure they want the west out as soon as it is safe, but they supported us doing it. But the left will not engage with them, at all.

I suggest some of these enraged lefties try getting in a minicab from time to time, sometimes your find them driven by an Iraqi and you can ask them directly as I have. Your find they do not support the lefts view of Iraq at all. They deserve their elections as much as we do ours!


Good luck making sense to your Labour comrades.
James - Man of the Right @ 34 weeks ago