By Poul Nyrup Rasmussen
Today is Europe Day, the annual celebration of European integration. It marks the day in 1950 on which the Schuman Declaration was signed, launching the Coal and Steel Community: the start of what we now call the European Union. The declaration included a commitment to “the equalisation and improvement of the living conditions of workers”. It is this commitment to the welfare of all that makes our Europe unique in the world. Our welfare states, including European-wide rights for consumers and workers, offer a level of protection that exists almost no-where else.
But on Europe Day 2009 Europeans are in no mood to celebrate. The financial crisis threatening our savings and pensions has been superceded by economic crisis threatening our jobs. The rising food and energy prices we suffered before the financial and economic crisis came on top of years of attacks on our social and public services and a widening gap between rich and poor.
There is a growing belief among citizens that Europe, which has had a conservative majority in all EU institutions for the last five years, puts the market before people.
I believe that we must put workers rights and social rights before competition rules. With unemployment looming towards 27 million next year, and 74 million Europeans already living below the poverty line, Europe’s future is at the crossroads. There is a real risk of deep and permanent divides in our societies. We must put the fight for social justice back at the heart of European politics. We need to do much more to tackle the worst inequalities, protect and create jobs and actively support those without work.
The European conservatives say in their manifesto that a high level of social contributions “is a handicap for the creation of wealth”. We disagree and we can prove it: the most competitive economies in Europe are Sweden and Denmark, with the highest levels of social protection and the highest taxes. According to the World Economic Forum, they are the third and fourth most competitive economies in the world. They are the first and third most income-equal societies in the world. They come fourth and seventh on the Global Innovation Index. They consistently top quality of life rankings.
Conservatives have made it quite clear that they think globalisation means we need to work longer hours, lower costs, slash spending and dilute social services. We disagree.
Our manifesto for the European elections promotes social justice by making 12 concrete proposals for a ‘New Social Europe’ including decent minimum wages in all EU countries, protecting public services, strengthening rights to collective bargaining, and fair tax policies to guarantee the financing of our welfare states.
It is not just a difference in rhetoric. Take a look at the votes in the European Parliament. When European Socialists voted to exclude social services from the infamous Services Directive, the conservatives voted against. When European Socialists voted for an average 48 hour working week with no opt outs the conservatives voted against. When European Socialists voted for a new directive against discrimination outside the workplace the conservatives voted against. Just this week Conservatives refused to vote for strengthening rights to maternity leave.
To highlight the need to put social justice back at the heart of Europe the PES is organising, today on Europe Day, a ‘Day of Action’ across Europe on the theme ‘giving people a fairer deal’ with meetings, debates and street campaigning in at least fourteen. You can follow action via live blogging and Twittering on our website.
In the European elections in June you can express your choice of the direction you wish Europe to take. Our future is at stake.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Look, luvvie, you do not understand.
The EU knows best and anyone who disagrees is a wrecker, Trot, etc etc.
People don't seem to realise that the EU Parliament is not like a national parliament where policies are discussed and decided.
The EU parliament is a project management team, the objective of the project is already decided, the parliament is only there to work out how to overcome any obstacles they meet along the way.
There is no mechanism to change the project objectives.
An MEP entering the parliament with with a 'non-federalist' position is the equivalent to a 'new boy' joining the board of a texan oil company and expecting to be able to persuade them that they should get out of oil and into ice cream production.
Give us back our democracy!
Regardless of being pro/anti, its as undemocratic as you could possibly be. Please lets stop pretending otherwise.
Thats turned out well hasn't it...
Aren't corus about to close another plant?
Indeed we can. Unfortunately no one will take the slightest bit of notice just like when the French and Dutch voted No to the European Constitution.
The Constitution document was cut and pasted into a new document (95 per cent identical) and cynically renamed the Lisbon Treaty. Since the document was no longer a "Constitution" but rather merely a "Treaty", nearly every government in the EU would be able to sign up without the need for a referendum.
The one exception was Ireland, whose government is bound by its own constitution to hold a referendum on signing international treaties. Ireland duly held a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty and rejected it.
Since that defeat Irish politicians have been subject to threats and recriminations for failing to secure a Yes vote. Even now plans are being made for a repeat of the referendum in order to obtain the "right" outcome. Does anyone believe that if the Irish had voted Yes to Lisbon, the EU would be making arrangements for a second referendum in order to check they really meant Yes when they first voted?
Anyone who thinks the foundation of the EU is a thing to be celebrated is no friend of democracy.
As for Europe, the dead hand of socialism is the last thing this country needs; I would expect the UK to be returning fewer left wingers in June to the EU.
Lastly, seeing as we are talking here about social rights - the right to vote in referenda was also promising to us by the UK government on the Lisbon Treaty.
How about campaigning for more rights for national voters to determine the direction they would like the EU to take?
As for the Lisbon Treaty, it's not a Constitution because it amends rather than replaces the previous Treaties and do they not have repeat referendums in Ireland on other matters, say on Abortion and/or the power of the Roman Catholic Church?
Voters don't like what the left id offering so they vote centre, centre-right and right. To blame it on the Press requires too much of a tin hat for my liking.
And for the Treaty not being the Constitution - please, leave that kind of statement for the 5 year olds; it's embarrassing.