Loading... Please wait...

Employees InVestas

EyesoresBy Chris Cook

Despite the outbreak of Vestas diaries, I felt I had to post on this subject as well, since I'm actively working on a municipal wind turbine project myself, have a background in the energy world, and have a good network of people with comprehensive industry knowledge.

The first thing to say is that the Danish owners are quite clear that if there were decent orders in the UK then the plant would not be closed. This means on-shore orders, because off-shore orders are only just beginning to become “bankable”. So while an off-shore project like Sheringham Shoals may be going ahead, being financed by Norwegian state entities, many of the rest in the pipeline rely on bank financing which is not easy to find right now.

The conventional government response in respect of on-shore is - as ever - that “Big is Beautiful” ad therefore that what is needed is massive fields of turbines plastered in high places developed and built by big corporates.  There is a pretty powerful, and reasonably well funded, coalition formed against these industrial scale developments, and frankly I'm not surprised.

I have long favoured the Danish approach of small scale and decentralised energy developments operating and funded at local level, and I spent an interesting afternoon talking to a Scottish farmer, Maitland Mackie about his plans.

He envisages literally thousands of turbines scattered around the UK countryside in rather the same way that wind-mills used to be a few centuries ago. Personally I would also favour where possible replacing strings of unsightly pylons with strings of (to my eyes) less unsightly turbines and burying the unsightly cables that link them. Don't believe a word the National Grid says about the costs of cable burial, by the way.

Key to Mackie's proposal was a Danish style “not for profit” approach to investment so that most, if not all the benefits of the turbines stayed local, instead of the conventional approach where developers come in, borrow as much as they can, give the community a new bus shelter, and then eff off to the next transaction with the loot in the back of their Range Rover.

Unfortunately for Mr Mackie, he was unable to make his (brilliant) scheme work, in my view because the legal and financial structure he planned, based upon the genetically modified Co-operative form of company known as an Industrial and Provident Society does not “scale” at all well.  So for the meantime Mackie's existing development of three Vestas V52s - Margaret, Matilda and Mirabel – will have to remain a prototype for what is possible.

But as a marketing approach, a decentralised network of community energy co-operatives has a lot to commend it, and would be entirely understood by Vestas, who would not be around without it.

Secondly, there is the question of the Vestas factory in the Isle of Wight. 

Here I advocate Venture Communism, by which I mean ownership by the staff of the business using a John Lewis style, or Tower Colliery style approach.

Vestas would be invited to remain as a supply partner supplying the motors etc, while the towers could of course come from Scotland. The Isle of Wight factory would turn out the blades, and possibly also for other makes as well in the future, and would work with Vestas or other experts to solve the quality issues which I understand affect some of the blades.

In other words, I advocate a partnership - within a UK LLP framework – involving the factory under employee ownership; Vestas as supply partner (but if not them another supplier); a marketing partner working to set up community energy partnerships throughout the country, and finally, a Capital Partner willing to risk necessary working capital in return for a share in the gross revenues. 

Maybe, as with Tower Colliery, the employees might be prepared to risk their redundancy money, and one would have thought that the Unions might find their membership (or pension funds) might join in as investors in solidarity as well, instead of looking for the government to bail out the factory.

So forget Nationalisation, Comrades, to the barricades for Venture Communism!

Posted on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:48am


6 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
Chris, I agree with you that those who wish to keep Vestas open should put their money where their mouth is.
Max Sceptic @ 52 weeks and 2 days ago
Does it really matter that the wind turbines are made in the UK? They will continue to be shipped in from Denmark or Germany or India in the future.

The UK missed that boat about 10 years ago. The best we can hope for is to make them under license.

The issue here is that our energy policy is in the hands of multinationals like E.ON and Vestas who have no obligation to any nation (except perhaps their own) or indeed any climate change target.

Feed-in tariffs should, if they are set an attractive level, make a big difference. Local councils and communities could build their own wind farms or solar arrays. More people will be able to go off-grid with solar, wind and heat pumps.

This could be a big vote winner for Labour if they get it right. A 'right to sell' self-generated electricity at a high rate, backed up by cheap loans/grants for the initial investment and a warm fuzzy feeling for helping the planet, should be extremely popular.



Tim Probert @ 52 weeks and 3 days ago
Chris,

This is an interesting article and soooooooooooooooo much more constructive than the "blame the Tories" brigade.

Localised on-shore generation within communities has got to be a good thing. Especially if they can achieve the double whammy of generating cheap electricity for themselves and selling any excess back to the national grid.
Jonathan Cook @ 52 weeks and 3 days ago
Good article Chris I agree with you on the decrentralised idea and of course with your proposition on the Partnership, though i wonder if the workers would risk thier redundecies....

Good article.
Ralph Baldwin @ 52 weeks and 3 days ago
Thanks Chris for bringing some sanity back into the debate however I still cannot see where the business will be coming from and how long it will take to generate and then who will pay the workers in the meantime.

Talks of nationalisation sweep the issue under the table, presumably with the hope that the lay-offs can be done quietly later on.

Talks of it all being the fault of the Tory councils don't do much either.

What we have here Chris are working men and women who want to save their jobs and the only way this can be achieved is by someone giving them a big order.

There is no other way. Why doesn't the government give then a big order and save the jobs; or are NuLabour no longer interested in helping the workers of this country?
Jon Feltham @ 52 weeks and 3 days ago
Maybe because the government doean't have any money. Actually, it never had any money of its own, it just spent all our money.

It's all gone - and our children and grandchildren will be paying for the debts that Nu-Labour have bequeathed them.
Max Sceptic @ 52 weeks and 2 days ago