Loading... Please wait...

Online Ops: What Lord Ashcroft’s £1.3 million “capital injection” into ConservativeHome really means

ConHomeBy Jag Singh / @jagsingh

Lord Ashcroft last week bought the ConservativeHome stable of sites, along with the PoliticsHome news aggregator, for what some would say was a paltry sum of £1.3 million. And yes, I'm just jealous about Labourhome not being worth £1.3 million.

I don’t see a business case for investing in a firm with no revenue (though you could argue the sites are very strong brands - ConHome is read by nearly every Tory operator, and PoliticsHome distributes content to most media/broadcast outlets in the country, bypassing traditional filters and getting straight to the opinion formers). No, this was entirely a political game, and Lord Ashcroft has upped the ante. But Labour will fight back.

This deal signals that the Tories are very serious about their online operations. Most of us have known about this for a while now, and a number of people on our side, like Sue MacMillan, Alex Smith, Sunder Katwala, Mark Hanson, Greg Jackson and some others have been working tirelessly behind the scenes (with very little support and even fewer resources - though Labour has really started to catch-up and will continue to expand, not by having someone to compete with Guido, but in terms of organising potential, and within the context of the collateral they are producing) on some exciting things. But looking at the bigger picture, WebCameron is easily contrasted with the PM’s now-notorious YouTube videos (though he does know how to tell a good joke).

It’s important we use the word online operations, because their activities won’t be restricted to the blogosphere. Tim Montgomerie and Lord Ashcroft are skilled and smart operators, and they understand how the blogosphere is essentially a distribution channel – but they've also got a wider vision, and it’s not at all blog-centric. Be prepared to see:

Online micro-fundraising on steroids
Essentially community fundraising for “approved candidates” who adhere to the ConHome principles of Conservativsm (these candidates don't actually need the cash, of course - but fundraising brings along with it a level of support and endearment by voters and constituents that is unmatched by other electioneering activities - it's about getting people involved with the whole process)

Video attack ads with very high production values
Don’t forget 18 Doughty Street folded into the PoliticsHome stable, bringing along with it lots of experience in the video/visual arenas.

mobile-targeted content and social networking functionality
From giving Conservative activists the tools to execute and gather data from exit polls in constituencies during by-elections, to pushing election results data to the talking heads’ Blackberries whilst they are on live on TV

Smarter gathering and usage of polling data
Relating to everything you can imagine, from the brand of chocolate preferred by Conservative candidates during their tea breaks, to the specific kind of content that is most viewed by likely Conservative supporters on the web, right down to which lines are being spun by public affairs agencies on specific policy areas that are preferred by the incoming batch of Tory MPs.

Stephan Shakespeare also knows a thing or two about gathering data, and using it. This also shifts the burden of attack away from CCHQ, to a private, shadow team. Yes, it’ll be owned by the bloke who happens to have an office larger than the party leader’s, but it won’t have the CCHQ logo on it. And their videos will probably look better than the official CCHQ versions.

It’s straight out of the American electioneering playbook – the best attack ads in the US always come from ‘outside’ the bubble. Remember the spoof 1984/Apple ad that attacked Hillary Clinton? It was the opening salvo from the Obama campaign, and it was Blue State Digital wot won the election. Oh, and one of their employees created that ad.

So what does this all mean? In one fell swoop, Lord Ashcroft has streamlined the Tories' area of the web, and created a private firm that combines all the synergies that come along with having access to arguably the biggest pipeline/distribution network, with access to all the important media contacts,  as well as the content that flows through that pipeline, and the knowledge of what kind of content is most popular and effective.

PS: Fret not, comrades – I know of a number of initiatives that will address Lord Ashcroft’s desire to dominate the world. From Will Straw’s Left Foot Forward to John Prescott’s GoFourth to my own online fundraising project (due to launch Q1 2010) to [name redacted]’s UK version of the Huffington Post. All I can say is, watch this space.

Posted on Sep 23, 2009 at 02:26pm

20 Comments · Show / Hide
Leave a comment »   show trash comments ·
Success breeds success. This site is damned by several factors:-

1 its genesis and the smears scandal

2 the Labour name.That brand is now worthless in the market.

3 the complete lack of a coherent political philosophy underpinning the Party and your policies (what are they by the way)
chris jones @ 19 weeks and 4 days ago
Success attracts success.

This site is damned by several factors:-

1
chris jones @ 19 weeks and 4 days ago
Indeed. And if someone hears some policy or other announced on the news and wants to find out more they will use an Internet search engine. A site's position on the returned list is vital to the site. ConsHome gets lots of hits and so will guaranteed to be on the first page, if not at the top. It only makes sense for Ashcroft to have a controlling hand over what the public think Conservatives think. If the public hear the sort of drivel that appears in the comments at ConsHome and associate it with the Conservative party they are likely to be persuaded not to vote.
Richard Blogger @ 19 weeks and 4 days ago
Hi Jag,
I think you've missed a key thing here.

The ConHome site is home to ranting, small minded, imbeciles, who are clearly way out of step with Dave(not the puppy slayer)Cameron.

If you want evidence that the Conservatives are still the party of some very nasty folks then visit that site.

Strikes me that Ashcroft/Cameron have decided to go for self preservation. I wouldn't be surprised if some vague moderation comes in now to stop the site being used as a means of collecting anti-tory scare stories to put in front of the public.

Clearly one of the things that contributes to the nasty tone of that site is that they clearly moderate out those not of a like mind and end up producing a ranting house where each contributor tries to outdo the next in posting bile and spite for all to see.

One of the advantages of LL is that it isn't a closed shop, and the more extreme Torieztheyeatbabiez crew generally get slagged out off for being so short sighted and stupid.

If we close up and lock the trolls out like ConHome then we descend to their level and confirm to even more people that we are the party of the deaf.

BTW I've just realised I have a 6lb sledge hammer in the garage available for free hire to any opposition leader who wants to use it to cause havoc in the Witney Blue Cross centre, providing he films his progress and puts it on YouTube.
Thomas Fairfax @ 19 weeks and 5 days ago
ConservativeHome is frequently polled as being the most regularly visited site by MPs and Peers (and their staff). The entire Tory frontbench team claim to read it every morning, and most newspaper editors and senior staff read it as well (server logs easily verify this).

We're talking about a site that has a larger readership than the New Statesman, Tribune, Spectator, Morning Star, etc etc - combined. There aren't any assumptions - it's data that is gathered directly from server logs.

Iain Dale has a writeup about a ComRes poll of MPs online habits: http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2009/09/guess-whose-blog-labour-mps-read-most.html

Consider the fact that blogs like Guido Fawkes' have brought down several cabinet ministers, in addition to a Special Adviser or two. I don't necessarily see that as being influential, but by most people's standards that's pretty darned (if not dangerously) powerful/influential.
Jag Singh @ 19 weeks and 5 days ago
Mike can't cope with people disagreeing with him.
Charlie Farley @ 19 weeks and 5 days ago
Hi Mike,
You don't want to ban all the trolls.
Some of them are quite adept at making me feel I'm not backing a completely dead nag. Just one that needs some rest and recuperation.
Thomas Fairfax @ 19 weeks and 5 days ago
Hi Ricki
I was banned by the prior idiot for not thinking he/Labour had the sun shining from their trousers. Alex has made it incomparably better.

Conhome of course is the resting place of those who think David Cameron is a pinkie wuss, that Ian Duncan Smith was a much misunderstood politician and William Hague only lost an election because the electorate did not understand how wonderful he was. It has a high concentration of neocons and neverwases and live sin a universe where Margaret thatcher is still the best thing since Hovis was marketed in 1883.

My view it's a grasssroots Tory site - but only for a certain type of Tory. My opinion is that 50% of the posters are human and the other 50% have died , gone to hell and been reborn as vampires. :-)

Most average Tory voters I suspect would find it a total turnoff.. Some of the posters appear to suffer from disorders which modern psychiatry can treat quite well:-)


michael walker @ 19 weeks and 5 days ago
Alex took over from a buffoon.

All credit to him for permitting opinion from all comers whilst maintaining some semblance of decency and moderation in the posts, which are usually entertaining and informative.

I shall of course continue in my attempt to lower the standard.
Mark Culley @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
I think the reason the PLP are keeping Brown is because most of them like Glorious Opposition and GB guarantees that for decades. So LL will be useful as you say then.
Jonathan Morse @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
Hi Mike

I did say as long as they behave

ricki
ricki lake @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
Ricki - I think the problem is when a blog aimed at Labour-minded people becomes overrun with opponents. ConHome doesn't allow that and I think that is part of the reason for their success.

I think that the site has improved but I think there still needs to be firmer moderation - not being a libertarian that doesn't bother me in the slightest! When that happens it could be an excellent way for people to re-engage with Labour.
Mike Homfray @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
Jag ; in reality, hardly anyone visits political blogs in terms of the total number of voters likely to support a party.

Its difficult to say how influential a blog can be and whether you accept the hypodermic syringe model of influence or not. Assuming an audience is more active then it may be far less simple. The point is that the amount of information available has become so enormous that any one outlet is more limited in its influence.

Mike Homfray @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
I disagree Mike. ConservativeHome itself is and always has been about giving a voice to the people outside the Westminster bubble (and most Tories who live outside Westminster do actually visit the site frequently). But combined with everything else Ashcroft has now bought, it has access to a great majority of people who decide what people outside the Westminster bubble think.

Let's examine what makes you feel a certain way about a given issue (and by extension will sway your decision on it) - chances are, it's down to two things: your experience with the particular issue, or what someone else (whom you know and trust, like a mate at work, or family member, or _newspaper_) has said about that issue in a given timeframe.

A blog itself is powerless, but if it has access to the people who decide what's going to be the line on Newsnight, or the frontpage article in tomorrow's Sun, and those people trust the blog a lot (like ConHome) then it's in a completely different ball game.
Jag Singh @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
Hi Mike

I dont mind tory or lib dems coming on here as long as they behave thelmselves .

On your other point I am not in the westminster bubble , just a odanary voter (, 2005 was aprotest over iraq ) I only felt comfatable to post on here recntly after seeing alot of "not nice " stuff when run by the previous editer.

I also think alex has done a good job (given where labourlist was ) , I also think that if we lose the next election this site will be very important in moving the labour party back to the grassroots .

ricki
ricki lake @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
oh, and lets not get too obsessed about this. Most voters never look at blogs at all. They are far more about enthusing activists. I don't think they make a great deal of impact outside the Westminster bubble. Certainly not up here
Mike Homfray @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
Given that political blogging only really took off as Labour started to lose popularity and energy, I think its hardly surprising - its never very exciting trying to defend a third term government

I do think that sites work better when they have a definitive purpose and I think that this site should be primarily for and by those of us who clearly identify as left of centre and disposed to vote Labour (even if like me, one may be disillusioned with aspects of the government)
Mike Homfray @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
Hi Micheal

100% agree , But wasnt conhome set up because they didnt like the leadership William Hauge or Micheal Howard and wanted to be grassroot tory site , Something which i think this site could be , I dont know if you agree but this site has got better since Alex started running it ?

ricki
ricki lake @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
Guido is NOT a Tory.
Any fool knows that.

Tory blogs do well as the Party is on the rise.

After 4 years in Government the Tories will be less popular and Labour blogs will do better.

But frankly Labour blogs are useless at giving real stories. Most of the so called news is one snooty student writing a silly letter to Alan Duncan or something like that.

And left wing blogs are SO serious and dull - Tom Harris excepted.

The moralising cant and air of righteous hypocrisy from some bloggers puts any sane person off.

.
michael walker @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago
Hi Labourlist

The only reason this might work is because voters are listening the the tory message and they are not listening to us( Labour) , We can go on saying its because they can afford it but if voters dont trust us then they wont listen.

ricki
ricki lake @ 19 weeks and 6 days ago